kevinkk wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 11:49 pm
That was weird. I kind of expected this a long time ago. Apparently there is some issue the rest of us, or at least I am unaware of.
Vernon made at least one post after the November scolding, which was nice of him to make,I guess it didn't last.
The discussions on what gets edited, and personal opinions of post content and such, really should be moved to a different thread.
That a thread is edited is at the whim of the moderators. It is well documented here and elsewhere that contributors do not like their content to be altered or deleted, no matter the why or purported reasoning, or whatever. It's human nature.
That it was edited and marked as such is proper moderation; never should content be edited without noting that it has been done. I had one post edited in a manner that changed the message in an inappropriate manner, and of course appeared to look like I had written it. This is unacceptable, and only by knowing that it was edited post facto, and who edited it, was I able to get it properly edited in a mutually agreeable form.
Now, I will chastise my esteemed colleagues here. There is no need to "pile on" and add insult to injury. This only further frustrates the contributing party. We also say this happen to Leroy- a bad situation made worse by his purported friends and colleagues- which didn't need to happen. His final days after a storied history of Lepidoptery ending in a gang-attack and ostracization. What a way to finish out.
Too, I have to point out that the membership and contribution here has dwindled to next to nothing. While there are a variety of factors, attacking [inclusive of alteration of content] members, for whatever reason, has been a primary contributor. There's what, five of us left here? Last one out turn off the server while claiming righteous superiority.