"Why are moths attracted to lights"...LepSoc Summer 2023
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 6:53 pm
"Why are moths attracted to lights? The mass extinctions may help provide the answers" Jad Aster T. Badon, LepSoc V65:No. 2.
I suppose no hypothesis is wrong, though clearly some are more correct than others. Hey, I'm a fan of heretical hypotheses, even tinfoil hat stuff. So when I read the title concerning moths, lights, and ancient extinctions I was interested.
But the title is about all that's interesting, or right. This paper is sheer loon. The author tries to establish a connection between the KT event which wiped out most animals, and moths coming to lights. In doing so the author throws common sense and established science to the wind, going to far as to cherry-pick quips from real publications for support- not unlike the mainstream media does.
Here are some stellar quotes:
The reason for the attraction of moths toward lights remains a mystery.
they must fly in a circle so that they will remain in place within the range of the light, since if they fly straight they will be out of range of the light.
The only way to trace their evolutionary existence is to look for fossil records.
Moths are attracted to light during the night-time.
There are other explanations on why some insects are attracted to light, and that is they use the moon to calibrate their orientation and direction...
...the main reason why insects are attracted to lights, there is survival, such as food resource and rendezvous with conspecifics.
Going back to the extinction scenario, the only possible way for moths to reproduce without exerting effort and time looking for the mates is to fly where other moths will be (at light sources.)
On that last one, I wonder what moths did before electrical lights. Perhaps they flew into fires to mate. And before that, moths found light sources in which to mate...where?
I must say, this is the highest level of lunacy I've read in an entomological paper. Overall, in the entirety of entomology and man, this is surpassed only by California Appellate Court which ruled bumblebees to be fish- but this paper comes close. That LepSoc published it is astonishing.
I suppose no hypothesis is wrong, though clearly some are more correct than others. Hey, I'm a fan of heretical hypotheses, even tinfoil hat stuff. So when I read the title concerning moths, lights, and ancient extinctions I was interested.
But the title is about all that's interesting, or right. This paper is sheer loon. The author tries to establish a connection between the KT event which wiped out most animals, and moths coming to lights. In doing so the author throws common sense and established science to the wind, going to far as to cherry-pick quips from real publications for support- not unlike the mainstream media does.
Here are some stellar quotes:
The reason for the attraction of moths toward lights remains a mystery.
they must fly in a circle so that they will remain in place within the range of the light, since if they fly straight they will be out of range of the light.
The only way to trace their evolutionary existence is to look for fossil records.
Moths are attracted to light during the night-time.
There are other explanations on why some insects are attracted to light, and that is they use the moon to calibrate their orientation and direction...
...the main reason why insects are attracted to lights, there is survival, such as food resource and rendezvous with conspecifics.
Going back to the extinction scenario, the only possible way for moths to reproduce without exerting effort and time looking for the mates is to fly where other moths will be (at light sources.)
On that last one, I wonder what moths did before electrical lights. Perhaps they flew into fires to mate. And before that, moths found light sources in which to mate...where?
I must say, this is the highest level of lunacy I've read in an entomological paper. Overall, in the entirety of entomology and man, this is surpassed only by California Appellate Court which ruled bumblebees to be fish- but this paper comes close. That LepSoc published it is astonishing.