Page 2 of 2

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2024 5:31 pm
by livingplanet3
Rosalia funebris - I hope to eventually find one of these. :)

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:00 am
by MikeH
livingplanet3 wrote: Tue Jul 30, 2024 5:31 pm Rosalia funebris - I hope to eventually find one of these. :)
I feel pretty lucky to have found it, just spotted on a log while out looking around. Then I saw several more on the same log so it must have been an emergence event.

I also found this lighting in the same area which was new to me too.

Image

At the Fourth of July Campground near Tajique.

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:29 am
by MikeH
Enaphalodes atomaris from Sierra Co. NM
Image

Enaphalodes seminitidus from Pima Co. Arizona
Image

Enaphalodes hispicornis from Coshise Co. Arizona
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:38 am
by MikeH
Eburia linsley from Cochise Co. Arizona
Image

Susuacanga falli from Pima Co. Arizona
Image

Malacopterus tenellus from Pima Co. Arizona
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 6:05 pm
by MikeH
Neoclytus irroratus sp. from Cochise Co. Arizona
Image

Derobrachus hovorei from Cochise Co. Arizona
Image

Derobrachus geminatus from Cochise Co. Arizona
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 7:03 pm
by MikeH
Obrium constricticolle from Santa Cruz Co. Arizona
Image

Anelaphus subdepressus from Pima Co. Arizona
Image

Anelaphus magnipunctatus from Cochise Co. Arizona
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2024 12:32 am
by bandrow
Hi MikeH,

Double-check your Enaphalodes atomarius - I believe this is actually Enaphalodes cortiphagus. And your Xylotrechus sp. from Cochise County is Neoclytus irroratus. Lots of good stuff!!

Cheers!
Bandrow

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2024 5:02 pm
by MikeH
bandrow wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 12:32 am Double-check your Enaphalodes atomarius - I believe this is actually Enaphalodes cortiphagus.
What is the best way to tell cortiphagus and atomarius apart? I had a hard time being certain on these.

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 1:20 pm
by MikeH
Trichocanonura linearis from Santa Cruz Co. Arizona
Image

Osmidus guttatus from Santa Cruz Co. Arizona
Image

Oeme rigida from Otero Co. Colorado
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 1:31 pm
by MikeH
Eutrichillus neomexicanus from Sierra Co. New Mexico
Image

Megasemum asperum from Sierra Co. New Mexico
Image

Sternidius imitans from Santa Cruz Co. Arizona
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 3:40 pm
by 58chevy
Mike, what books do you use to ID your beetles?

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 4:42 pm
by MikeH
Valenus inornatus from Cochise Co. Arizona
Image

Tragosoma spiculum from Cochise Co. Arizona
Image

Eustromula validum from Pima Co. Arizona
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 5:21 pm
by MikeH
58chevy wrote: Wed Aug 21, 2024 3:40 pm Mike, what books do you use to ID your beetles?
My favorite approach is to post them on iNaturalist and let other people ID them for me but that does not seem to work that fast for longhorns, it is usually fast for Buprestidae and tiger beetles though.

I tend to use a few different sources for longhorns, "cerambycidae of North America" series is useful when I can get ahold of a copy but it is out of print and a little out of date. I can usually get a interlibrary loan at my local library from CSU or Univ of Wyoming but that does last long. A lot of times once I am confident about the genus, I will just Google or check bugguide for a key and that works sometimes, I've found that especially useful of Aneflomorpha for example.

I also have the two Evans books for eastern and western US which are nice to get close and a tiger beetles field guide which I don't find that useful, probably since I haven't spent enough time on it.

And volume 2 of American beetles which is super technical but should always key to a genus and have references to find a species key.

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 10:59 pm
by MikeH
Methia sp. from Cochise co. Arizona
Image

Methia sp. from Pima Co. Arizona
Image

Poliaenus nuevoleonis from Cochise co. Arizona
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 11:08 pm
by MikeH
Aneflus paracalvatus from Pima co. Arizona
Image

Aneflus protensus from Pima co. Arizona
Image

Phymatodes sp. from Baker co. Oregon
Image

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2024 12:10 pm
by Chuck
Great photos Mike, thanks for taking the time to post them.

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2024 6:32 am
by Pierre
Two places to know and to use:

-> Larry Bezarks Cerambycidae catalogue. A MUST for identifying longhorn beetles.

http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdefault.asp?w=n

-> Francesco Vitalis Cerambycidae-forum. A MUST for meeting colleagues, discussing and identifying specimens. A community of Cerambycidae enthousiasts both amateurs and scientists.

https://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/default.asp

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2024 1:02 am
by bandrow
MikeH wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 5:02 pm
bandrow wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 12:32 am Double-check your Enaphalodes atomarius - I believe this is actually Enaphalodes cortiphagus.
What is the best way to tell cortiphagus and atomarius apart? I had a hard time being certain on these.
Hi Mike,

Sorry for the slow response - I'm rarely on here much due to a workload that's keeping me underwater.

There are differences in the shape of the last abdominal segments for both sexes, but the character I like to use is the nature of the elytral pubescence. In E. atomarius, the elytra are covered with short, erect golden setae in addition to the patches of grayish recumbent setae that create their mottled appearance. In E. cortiphagus, the elytra lack these erect setae, instead having dense recumbent gray setae only.

Hope this helps!
Bandrow

Re: New Cerambycidae

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2024 1:17 am
by bandrow
Hi Mike,

Your Phymatodes sp. from Baker County, Oregon is an interesting beast. I've never seen this species and the closest I can come to a name might be Phymatodes hardyi. There is just a single image on Bezark's site: http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=4571&w=n

The antennae on yours seem a bit different in the relative lengths of the antennomeres, but this could be due to your specimen and the one on Bezark being different sexes.

When I first saw this, I thought it could be a Haplidus species, but the locality is way out of range and it doesn't quite match that genus.

Very cool, whatever it is!!
Bandrow