wollastoni wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 1:21 pm But in my garden, it seems to have no effect at all on the butterflies I have in the area

Perhaps you have the wrong variety/species, some do not attract butterflies, or maybe local conditions are not favourable to nectar production.

Adam.

I agree with Jshuey in principle, but if the table also includes previously unpublished data you can add the following at the end of the table legend: Table includes data adapted from that provided in Smith 1999 and and Jones 2000. Of course you should also cite the publications in the References se...

The type locality of Papilio maackii han (Yoshino, 1997) is 'Mt. Wuyishan, Fujiang prov., China', and it is considered to be the senior synonym of shimogorii Fujioka, 1997 (type locality: 'Mt. Omeishan, Sichuan, China'), i.e. han is the valid subspecies name for P. maackii occurring at least between...

Althouh they claimed them as Papilio lowii from Marinduque. These are farm bred accidental hybrids. True P. memnon lowii only occurs on Palawan, but many years ago the farms in the other Philippines islands obtained breeding stock of lowii from Palawan to breed, at the same time as what were origin...

Thanks Adam, and I have a question about Papilio agenor from Taiwan. Does ssp. agenor distribute In Taiwan? For I saw pictures of several specimens signed 'Papilio (Menelaides) memnon agenor from LIANJIANG Co., Nangan, Jinsha, 23. V. 2014, HSU 14E60.1' or 'JINMEN Co., Jinhu, Haiyinsi, 13. V. 2013, ...

It is very difficult to be certain which subspecies this female belongs to without locality (island is enough) data since the obvious differences are in the males. Females of most subspecies are rather variable whereas males are not. This specimen could be ssp. anceus from Sumatra or ssp. memnon may...

I don't think it is a good idea to use the yet to be published scientific name for what I assume has previously been called 'MST' here. Once it has been validly published there will be no issue about using it, but if the name appears even on a forum like Insectnet it will spread and that could becom...

It would be a good idea to add a label to the specimen's pin stating that the abdomen came from a yellow form female, and include locality data for that female. Maybe one day in future a researcher will use this specimen for their studies, and the information would be important.

Adam.

Yes, probably this is Calinaga buddha bedoci, see
https://yutaka.it-n.jp/cali/6b010010.html

Adam.

One advantage of BOLD is they require(?) a photo of the sequenced specimen and locality data to be uploaded as well as the sequence. That means it is possible to confirm the identity of the specimen that the sequence came from. GenBank was adapted from medical use to a biological one, and unless thi...

Chuck wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 7:44 pmthis is just about what we call it.

Exactly, but that is also very important so that everyone uses the same scientific name for the species, and readers around the world know what someone is discussing regardless of the language used.

Adam.

For those who might be interested, the vote on the application (Case 3767) was as follows: The Case was split into 3 parts: (1) use its plenary power to set aside all previous fixations of type specimens for the nominal species Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793, and to designate the specimen INS_LEP_0...

And, in Leps alone, many specific names used under multiple genus. Homonymy between species-group names (either species or subspecies) only occurs when the same name is used within a single genus; so it is perfectly acceptable for a specific name to occur in different genera, even within the same f...

Almost certainly, but there is no homonymy between zoological and botanical genus names. Each has it's own Code of Nomenclature, and there is no 'cross-control'. I think there are many examples of the same genus name being used in animals and plants.

Adam.

Yes, Doritis pulcherrima is native to Thailand.

Adam.

Glad to be able to explain it simply.

Adam.

In our application (Case 3767) we designated a neotype for Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne ) and asked the ICZN Commission to overturn the 2011 neotype designation for P. phoebus , and proposed a specimen in St. Petersburg Museum from the type locality as a new neotype. T...

No, Hanus & Theye (2010) decided the illustration of the type (specimen no longer in existence) was actually Parnassius ariadne and changed the names, with the next oldest name replacing P. phoebus . Then in 2011 they made it worse by designating a neotype for P. phoebus which was a specimen of ...

Happy New Year to all members and guest readers.

Hopefully 2024 will be entomologically productive for everyone.

Adam.

The ICZN Commission has passed the application in Case 3767: Case 3767 – Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus ; Insecta, Lepidoptera): proposed conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne ) by ...